GREETINGS

pls. forgive me is i am wrong, as per your answer Rama had done the responsibility of a ruler to be a role model, it is not unfair to leave an innocent lady on the forest, as per the ramayena, lakshmana had left her near the ashrama not in the ashrama and it is one of the deciple who had seen a lady crying near the river and informed saint Valmiki. If what Rama had done real justice, on the basis of a rumour, is it not encourage the ordinary people just to leave their wife on some rumours, as it can be spread by any one with or without a clear reason. In fact Sita had given agnipariksha to prove her purity also it is said in Ramayana that it is not the real sita but maya sita who had been stolen by Ravana and Rama is very well know this factor. Even in this position how can this act of Rama can be justified??????